Friendship, Listening, and Empathy: A Prayer GuideDraw Near: A Lenten Devotional Two Hands: Grief and Gratitude in the Christian LifeSabbath Keeping: Finding Freedom in the Rhythms of Rest Fasting: Spiritual Freedom Beyond our AppetitesA Renewed SpiritualityNurturing Hope: Christian Pastoral Care in the Twenty-First CenturyThe Power of ListeningJoy Together: Spiritual Practices for Your CongregationPrayers of the New TestamentPrayers of the Old TestamentPersonality Type in CongregationsSabbathA Garden of Living Water: Stories of Self-Discovery and Spiritual GrowthDead Sea: A NovelDeadly Murmurs: A NovelDeath in Dunedin: A NovelBeating Burnout in CongregationsReaching Out in a Networked WorldEmbracing MidlifeFriendingAdvent Devotional

Journey with God the migrator

Lynne Baab • Tuesday September 9 2025

Journey with God the migrator

God doesn’t let King David build a temple in part because God wants to stay with the people of Israel, on the move. God speaks to David through the prophet Nathan: “I have been moving about in a tent and a tabernacle” (2 Samuel 7:6), referring to God’s presence with Israel during the time of the patriarchs, the captivity in Egypt, and the exodus from Egypt. Central to our faith is this understanding of God with us, leading us, journeying alongside us, dwelling with us. At Christmas, we sing about one of Jesus’s names—Immanuel, God with us.

Every week, I put my blog posts on Facebook as well as sending out an email to subscribers. Early in this series on journey, theologian Marty Folsom, author of Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics for Everyone, commented on Facebook:

“Karl Barth talked about the journey of the Son into the Far Country and then the journey home. He sees our participation in this journey as our theological quest, then sharing His journey into the world to bring good news.”

In order for God to be with us, Jesus had to leave his home in heaven. Theologian Peter C. Phan uses the language of “God the Migrant” to describe the constant theme of movement in Jesus’s story. Dr. Phan emphasizes

“Jesus’s status as a stranger and migrant in his own country, his foreign ancestry (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba), his birth far from home (Luke 2:1–7), his and his family’s escape to Egypt as refugees (Matt 2:13–14), his ministry as a homeless and itinerant preacher who has nowhere to lay his head (Luke 9:58), his fate as an unwelcome stranger in his own country (John 1:11), and his self-identification with the stranger (Matt 25:35).” [1] 862

In a vivid paragraph Dr. Phan describes the ways that Jesus demonstrates his status as a migrant:

“Furthermore, Jesus carried out his ministry at the margins of his society. A migrant and border-crosser at the very roots of his being, Jesus . . . crossed these borders back and forth, repeatedly and freely, be they geographical, racial, gender, social, economic, political, cultural, or religious. What is new about his message about the kingdom of God, which is good news to some and scandal to others, is that for him it removes all borders serving as barriers, both natural and man-made, and is absolutely all-inclusive. Jesus invited Jews and non-Jews, men and women, the old and the young, the rich and the poor, the powerful and the weak, the healthy and the sick, the clean and the impure, the righteous and the sinners, and any other imaginable categories of peoples and groups, to enter into the house of his merciful and forgiving Father. Even in his ‘preferential option for the poor’ Jesus did not abandon and exclude the rich and the powerful. These, too, are called to conversion and to live a just, all-inclusive life.” [2]

Dr. Phan argues that without human migration, the Gospel wouldn’t have spread around the world. He also argues that we have a powerful call and obligation to care for migrants because we understand that God is a migrant. When migrants are “embraced, protected, and loved,” God the Migrant is “embraced, protected, and loved.” When migrants, who bear the image of God the Migrant, are “rejected, marginalized, declared ‘illegal,’ imprisoned, tortured, or killed,” we are actually subjecting God the Migrant to that same inhumane treatment. [3]

I found Dr. Phan’s article riveting. On the one hand, thinking about the generosity of Jesus’s journey to earth for our sake makes my heart sing. On the other hand, I grieve at the way migrants and foreigners have always been treated and the way they are treated today in the United States and in many other parts of the world. As a person trained in communication, I am painfully aware of the ways we use language to create barriers between ourselves and others—and too often those others are migrants and foreigners.

We are invited to journey with Jesus into the world, to make known the goodness of God, the Good News of Jesus’s love for us. As Marty Folsom says, this is our quest.

Jesus, Redeemer, we praise and thank you for your willingness to become a migrant for our sakes. Our hearts soar at the wonder of your willingness to sacrifice your home in heaven for us. At the same time, our hearts are heavy as we think about the millions of migrants in our world who suffer in so many ways.  We want to embrace, protect, and love those who are created in your image, but the needs are overwhelming and far beyond our resources. Help us grieve with you and listen to your guidance for being your people in this hurting world.

֍ ֍ ֍

Next week: Journey and attention. Illustration by Dave Baab: Blueskin Bay, New Zealand

Related posts:

֍ ֍ ֍

Two ways to subscribe.

If you’d like to receive an email when I post on this blog, sign up below under “subscribe.” That email and the posts on this blog are free and accessible for all.

If you’d like to help me cover the expenses for this blog and website, plus get a bonus post every month, you can subscribe on Patreon for $3 or $6 per month. My bonus posts focus on one or more of the hundreds of vivid quotations I’ve collected over five decades.

[1] and [2] Peter C. Phan, “Deus Migrator—God the Migrant: Migration of Theology and Theology of Migration,”Theological Studies, 2016, Vol. 77(4), 862.
[3] Ibid, 861.



« Previous post